DIP74 - where is at?
Ola Fosheim Grøstad via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Oct 13 15:28:20 PDT 2015
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 at 22:20:02 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> Maybe, but at this point, I think that C++ is actually getting
> features faster than D is.
And as a result advanced c++ analyzers work on lowlevel IR, not
at the language level.
That has many consequences, one is time consumption, another is
accuracy.
> We talk about adding features or tweaking existing features to
> fix problems, but we're long past the point where we're
> frequently adding features.
More syntax sugar is not problematic. It is what you have left
when you factor out everything that is expressible by other
mechanisms that matters.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list