[OT] LLVM Community Code of Conduct

[Chris via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 08:11:20 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 06:36:32 UTC, logicchains wrote:
>> Even if it's not entirely logical, all these unfinished 
>> aspects can add up to produce a less positive aesthetic 
>> impression of the language compared to a language that comes 
>> across as more polished.
>
> If go is finished, why there's activity in its repository?

I agree with logicchains. The impression people have is exactly 
this. Go = neat and tidy, D = mess. This has nothing to do with 
whether Go is actually finished and tidy or not. Go also appeals 
to people, because it is highly prescriptive and leaves no room 
for doubt "You do it like this, because we think it's the best 
way to do it! Full stop." Weird, but this appeals to people.