[OT] LLVM Community Code of Conduct

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 18:38:38 UTC, Charles Pritchard 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 10:24:34 UTC, Andrei 
> Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 10/15/15 11:11 AM, Kagamin wrote:
>>> On Thursday, 15 October 2015 at 06:36:32 UTC, logicchains 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Even if it's not entirely logical, all these unfinished 
>>>> aspects can
>>>> add up to produce a less positive aesthetic impression of 
>>>> the language
> ...
>> I would agree that we're less polished than Go and other 
>> languages. This is something we need to work on - just show 
>> the world a completely defined and implemented language. -- 
>> Andrei
>
> I'd like to see a roadmap, covering some of the pain points 
> that logicchains brought up. It'd be nice to look at it, and 
> get the impression that those issues will be resolved within an 
> estimated time period; mainly around GC and ref.

Making a roadmap when you don't have people you pay to stick to 
it doesn't really work. It's like trying to transport frogs using 
a wheelbarrel.