Synchronized classes have no public members

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 16 00:02:54 PDT 2015


On 2015-10-16 08:49, Dicebot wrote:

> As far as I understand topic is about deprecating direct field access of
> synchronized classes, method calls in synhronized classes and
> `synchronized () {}` blocks will remain untouched.

Is it even possible to do synchronized classes in Java? That is, but 
synchronized on the class declaration as in D.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list