Synchronized classes have no public members

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 07:00:42 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> Yeah, that was the original topic. Then I interpreted it like 
> all uses of "synchronized" would be deprecated.

That would be really bold thing to do, I don't think anyone 
realistically proposes that. At most I'd suggest to explicitly 
mark it in spec / documentation as legacy and unidiomatic feature 
with no deprecation. Removing it does no benefit at this point 
(even if I believe it shouldn't have been there from the very 
start)