0 in version number?

extrawurst via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 16 08:29:13 PDT 2015


On Friday, 16 October 2015 at 15:20:54 UTC, Shriramana Sharma 
wrote:
> I always wondered why DMD releases have a 0 in their minor 
> version number -- surely 2.068 is the same as 2.68? Why then 
> retain the zero?

Yeah consistent SemVer would be better.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list