Synchronized classes have no public members
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 16 11:50:15 PDT 2015
On 2015-10-16 16:07, Dicebot wrote:
> That would be really bold thing to do, I don't think anyone
> realistically proposes that. At most I'd suggest to explicitly mark it
> in spec / documentation as legacy and unidiomatic feature with no
> deprecation. Removing it does no benefit at this point (even if I
> believe it shouldn't have been there from the very start)
Ok, cool. DWT doesn't use synchronized classes so I don't really care :)
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list