[OT] LLVM Community Code of Conduct

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 16 11:53:43 PDT 2015


On 2015-10-16 12:27, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> The areas I consider incomplete:
>
> * Language definition, e.g. "shared".
> * Language definition _writeup_, we need to be a lot more precise than
> we currently are.
> * Process for introducing new features, i.e. right now we seem to have
> some of the drawbacks of a large political organization and also the
> drawbacks of a small community.
> * Parts of stdlib, e.g. no robust idioms for transferring complex
> objects across threads, unneeded use of the GC, insufficient support for
> safe garbage collection; also no extensive containers, file formats,
> etc. etc.
> * Tutorials - there's no simple tutorial material that takes people from
> novice to initiated status.

The module system? Perhaps not incomplete, but the wholes need to be 
plugged. Issue 313, 314 and all the issues that lately come up with 
local imports.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list