[OT] LLVM Community Code of Conduct

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 18 Oct 2015 9:45 am, "Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d" <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, 18 October 2015 at 07:37:55 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>>
>> Essentially, the reason D has not been ported to X has nothing to do
with lack of compiler support.  A compiler can always be built to target X,
and if that wasn't enough, there are many ready built packages available
that target X.
>>
>> It is now your job as porters to fix up druntime to allow a library to
be built by these compilers.
>
>
> That's not very useful. LDC and GDC still include Phobos and Druntime.
>

It is infinitely more useful than having no compiler at all to test porting
changes.

> You're essentially saying that once LDC gets Android/iOS support, GDC
will automatically get it as well with no effort required from you?
>

In it's runtime? Correct - assuming no one invents any new predefined
version conditions in the process. :-)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20151018/b7c0e300/attachment.html>