0 in version number?

[Shriramana Sharma via Digitalmars-d]

Kagamin wrote:

> $ ls -v1 | sort

ls -v1 | sort -V

:-D

But there's still no good answer to the question why there should be a zero 
in 2.068.2; OTOH, I discovered that since the API is still unstable, 2.068 
should actually be 2.0.68.2 meaning 2nd bugfix release of the 68th minor 
release of the 0th major version i.e. unstable API of the 2nd version of the 
language.

-- 
Shriramana Sharma, Penguin #395953