s/TypeTuple/AliasSeq/g?

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 14:10:01 UTC, Dragos Carp wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 October 2015 at 13:18:39 UTC, Shriramana Sharma 
> wrote:
>> Since TypeTuple is now an alias of AliasSeq, I suppose it's OK 
>> to replace all occurrences of TypeTuple in std.traits by 
>> AliasSeq?
>
> Unfortunately it is not so easy. I think that we can proceed to 
> replace `TypeTuple` in `std.traits`, only after we have 
> `AliasSeq`-like names for non-private names like 
> `BaseTypeTuple`, `RepresentationTypeTuple`, 
> `TransitiveBaseTypeTuple` or even `isTypeTuple`. IMO they 
> belong together.

We should weed these out over time. Not really remove them, as to 
not break old code, but just create new names for these and 
remove old name from the doc and all.