[OT] LLVM Community Code of Conduct

Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Oct 20 13:02:17 PDT 2015


On 20 October 2015 at 20:44, Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d <
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Monday, 19 October 2015 at 21:24:00 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>
>> In order:
>> You are responsible, the library maintainers (I chip in a bit on the side
>> when I have the hardware / virtual environment).
>> You are responsible, the authors and reviewers of the testsuite and
>> unittests.
>>
>
> Who is this "You", specifically?
>
> If I run into a bug with GDC on a specific platform/architecture, who am I
> supposed to talk to? With DMD/Phobos bugs I can at least use "git blame".
>
> Also, are you saying that it is every Phobos/Druntime contributor's
> responsibility to make sure that their changes are GDC-compatible? Other
> than the Travis auto-tester which seems to be failing half the time, we
> don't have any CI or any tests at all for GDC!
>
>

What can I say?  We have a lot of faith in our porters. :-)


You can talk to me if you run into any problems, because I'm certainly more
*aware* of porting and portability than most other druntime and compiler
maintainers.  However you submit to upstream.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20151020/12d3f053/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list