Vision

[Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 22 October 2015 at 15:11:35 UTC, Szymon Gatner wrote:
> looses faith that the project makes sense in the first place

And that's the main point right there: does an image and/or 
windowing library written in D make any sense?

In a world where the C++ interlope wasn't going anywhere, I would 
say maybe, but that's not the case. With ddmd the C++ interlope 
has improved a great deal (so I'm told), and this document lays 
out that it should improve even farther. So, why not have the 
push to have a working Qt binding by the middle of next year 
rather than redo all of the work that that team has done in D?