Automatic method overriding in sub-classes
Tofu Ninja via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Oct 26 17:12:40 PDT 2015
On Tuesday, 27 October 2015 at 00:07:36 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 10/26/2015 04:25 PM, Tofu Ninja wrote:
>> ##################################
>> class A
>> {
>> void foo(this T)() { writeln(T.stringof); }
>> void bar(auto override this T)() { writeln(T.stringof); }
>> }
>>
>> class B : A {}
>>
>> void main()
>> {
>> A a = new A();
>> a.foo(); // prints "A"
>> a.bar(); // prints "A"
>>
>> B b = new B();
>> b.foo(); // prints "B"
>> b.bar(); // prints "B"
>>
>> A c = new B();
>> c.foo(); // prints "A"
>> c.bar(); // prints "B" <-- main advantage, method is
>> virtual
>> }
>> ##################################
>
> I don't understand all uses of the request but typeid() returns
> a TypeInfo reference, which is about the actual type of an
> object. The following change produces the expected output in
> this case (except, it has the added module name):
>
> void bar() { writeln(typeid(this).name); }
>
> The output:
>
> A
> deneme.A
> B
> deneme.B
> A
> deneme.B
>
> Ali
For something as simple as the name, yea, type id works. But for
something like iterating over UDA's or looking at
__traits(allMembers) or something like that, type id is not what
is needed.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list