DMD is slow for matrix maths?

Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Oct 27 11:18:34 PDT 2015


On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 20:30:51 UTC, rsw0x wrote:
> On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 11:37:17 UTC, Etienne Cimon wrote:
>> On Monday, 26 October 2015 at 04:48:09 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 02:37:16AM +0000, Etienne Cimon via 
>>> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>>>
>>> If you must use DMD, I recommend filing an enhancement 
>>> request and bothering Walter about it.
>>>
>>>
>>> T
>>
>> I'd really like the performance benefits to be available to 
>> DMD users as well. I think I'll have to write it all with 
>> inline assembler just to be sure...
>
> dmd will never reach gdc/ldc performance, gcc and LLVM have 
> entire teams of people that actively contribute to their 
> compilers.

LDC couldn't inline it either. My only options at this point is 
to write the assembly or link to a C library.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list