Make all new symbols go through std.experimental?

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 28 October 2015 at 09:08:08 UTC, Robert burner 
Schadek wrote:
> 3. Every move of code from experimental to stable will require 
> user interaction. I thought we were trying to not break old 
> code nowadays.

Yeah. By putting stuff in std.experimental, we guarantee that 
we're going to break the code of anyone using it, whereas if we 
put it in std, we only have to break their code if we have to in 
order to make a fix (be it a bug fix or an API fix). The only 
upside to putting it in std.experimental in that regard is that 
folks should then expect that their code will be broken (and 
presumably trivially fixed), whereas normally, their code 
shouldn't break due to changes in std. It _will_ happen upon 
occasion whether we want it to or not though.

I'm not completely against this proposed change, but it really 
does feel like it would just be adding extra churn without really 
adding much value (occasional value, probably, but in most cases, 
probably not).

- Jonathan M Davis