DIP 84: Static Inheritance

anonymous via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Oct 30 09:21:53 PDT 2015


On Friday, 30 October 2015 at 14:39:47 UTC, Atila Neves wrote:
> From the discussion here: 
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/tgnxocozkurfvmxqofnn@forum.dlang.org, I thought a library solution would do to fix the issue of getting decent error messages when a type fails to satisfy a template constraint that it was meant to, such as `isInputRange`. So I submitted a PR (https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/3677), it's been there ever since and doesn't seem like it'll go anywhere from the discussion (http://forum.dlang.org/post/qvofihzmappftdiwdaue@forum.dlang.org).
>
> So the only other way is a DIP (http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP84) 
> for language and compiler support for static inheritance. It's 
> backwards-compatible and IMHO worth looking at.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Atila

To be honest. The idea of having a library fix error messages 
seems sort of like a band-aid solution rather than a real 
solution. Don't get me wrong, I use band aids, but I think the 
DIP solution is a more proper approach. As far as the DIP, I like 
what was proposed.

> Structs can't currently inherit and so wouldn't need static. 
> However, it might be preferable to require it anyway for parity 
> with classes:

I would say I agree that it should be required, just for 
consistency sake.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list