dmd codegen improvements
Ola Fosheim Grostad via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Sep 3 14:08:50 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 10:04:58 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 09:56:55 UTC, Ola Fosheim
> Grøstad wrote:
>> On Thursday, 3 September 2015 at 06:18:54 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> It is twice as slow as native. That's far from allowing
>>> generation of pure assembly.
>>
>> It is translatable to pure assembly, addressing is modulo heap
>> size. Performance is a different issue since it does not
>> provide SIMD yet.
>
> SIMD is not even remotely close to explaining the perf
> difference.
What browser? Only FF supports it. Chrome just JIT it IIRC.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list