Benchmarking suite

[qznc via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 9 September 2015 at 16:58:41 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 21:11 +0000, qznc via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> 
> […]
>> Yes. I'm not sure how to structure this whole suite. The 
>> general goal is "D claims that it can match C/C++ in 
>> performance, let's have some actual numbers". So far D mostly 
>> disappoints in terms of performance.
>> 
>> […]
>
> Which D compilers are you testing with?

The benchmark records all versions: 
https://qznc.github.io/d-shootout/

> I have found DMD to be OK but often a bit slow compared to C++ 
> codes
> using GCC and Clang. However, LDC and GDC generally create 
> executables
> from D codes that are at least as fast as C++ with GCC and 
> Clang.

Yes, that is the general opinion. However, I have a hard time to 
reach the obscenely tuned C++ programs.