Better lambdas!!!!!!!!!!
anonymous via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Sep 10 11:05:42 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 17:55:06 UTC, Prudence wrote:
> Of course, this hides the names outside the lambda, but a
> warning could be issued(no different than if one does it
> explicitly.
This makes the parameter names part of the API. The author of a
library is unable to rename parameter without breaking user code.
I do not believe the benefit is large enough to accept such a
drawback.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list