Better lambdas!!!!!!!!!!

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 18:05:43 UTC, anonymous wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 17:55:06 UTC, Prudence wrote:
>> Of course, this hides the names outside the lambda, but a 
>> warning could be issued(no different than if one does it 
>> explicitly.
>
> This makes the parameter names part of the API. The author of a 
> library is unable to rename parameter without breaking user 
> code. I do not believe the benefit is large enough to accept 
> such a drawback.

That's one of the main reasons that I hate the idea of named 
arguments. It's more stuff that's part of the API, more public 
stuff that you have to name correctly and risk bikeshedding 
arguments over, and more stuff that can you can't change without 
breaking existing code.

- Jonathan M Davis