Better lambdas!!!!!!!!!!

[wobbles via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 18:23:52 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 18:05:43 UTC, anonymous wrote:
>> On Thursday, 10 September 2015 at 17:55:06 UTC, Prudence wrote:
>>> Of course, this hides the names outside the lambda, but a 
>>> warning could be issued(no different than if one does it 
>>> explicitly.
>>
>> This makes the parameter names part of the API. The author of 
>> a library is unable to rename parameter without breaking user 
>> code. I do not believe the benefit is large enough to accept 
>> such a drawback.
>
> That's one of the main reasons that I hate the idea of named 
> arguments. It's more stuff that's part of the API, more public 
> stuff that you have to name correctly and risk bikeshedding 
> arguments over, and more stuff that can you can't change 
> without breaking existing code.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis

+1