Reasons to use D

[Bahman Movaqar via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 11 September 2015 at 13:15:03 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> "3. The documentation poor."
>
> I agree.... but so is the documentation for virtually 
> everything else I've ever used too. I'd take D's over Ruby's 
> for example.

Couldn't help but to drop in and count two exceptions: Racket's 
docs[1] and Java API docs[2].

[1] http://docs.racket-lang.org/
[2] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/