std.experimental.testing formal review

Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Sep 12 07:48:25 PDT 2015


On 2015-09-12 11:52, Atila Neves wrote:

> I guess you're right. In any case, getting what's in there to get
> accepted is work enough as it is.

Yes, absolutely. I wasn't arguing for the feature, just the reason not 
to add it :)

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list