Stroustrup is disappointed with D :(
John Carter via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Sep 22 13:52:27 PDT 2015
On Tuesday, 22 September 2015 at 19:52:48 UTC, Ola Fosheim
Grøstad wrote:
> But neither approach is good for correctness.
The approach that would be "Good for Correctness" is "Hey! You're
doing to much work in a constructor, that's a code smell anyway.
And invoking virtual methods in a constructor is bound to be
flaky no matter what the language designer chooses... so don't do
that."
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list