std.experimental.testing formal review

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 28 September 2015 at 10:03:14 UTC, Robert burner 
Schadek wrote:
> Review of std.experimental.testing formal review
>
> the two weeks of the formal review phase are over.
> The review thread was very shallow. Dicebot again expressed 
> this disaffection with the assert function names 
> "should(BeTrue|BeFalse|...)" No agreement could be found. 
> Personally, I'm not sure if an agreement can be found, as this 
> is more a personal style question rather then technical 
> question.
>
> Some minor comments still need to be addressed:
> std.experimental.testing.reflection.TestData fields have no DDoc
>
> I will start the voting thread a week from now.

Added the DDoc.

Atila