Moving back to .NET

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 29 September 2015 at 11:53:45 UTC, Ola Fosheim 
Grøstad wrote:
> It isn't "just C++", but D as a language is close enough to be 
> considered a close relative. So if you are used to implementing 
> libraries in C++, the jump to D is not a big jump.

That's as true as saying that D is similar enough to Java that it
wouldn't be a big jump. You'd end up with code that looks like 
C++ or
Java that no seasoned D developer would write.

The difference is actually quite big. If it weren't, why would
any of us bother?

Atila