Any usable SIMD implementation?

[Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d]

On 3 Apr 2016 8:15 am, "9il via Digitalmars-d" <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com>
wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 31 March 2016 at 08:23:45 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
>>
>> I'm currently working on a templated arrayop implementation (using RPN
>> to encode ASTs).
>> So far things worked out great, but now I got stuck b/c apparently none
>> of the D compilers has a working SIMD implementation (maybe GDC has but
>> it's very difficult to work w/ the 2.066 frontend).
>>
>>
https://github.com/MartinNowak/druntime/blob/arrayOps/src/core/internal/arrayop.d
https://github.com/MartinNowak/dmd/blob/arrayOps/src/arrayop.d
>>
>> I don't want to do anything fancy, just unaligned loads, stores, and
integral mul/div. Is this really the current state of SIMD or am I missing
sth.?
>>
>> -Martin
>
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> Is it possible to introduce compile time information about target
platform? I am working on BLAS from scratch implementation. And it is no
hope to create something useable without CT information about target.
>
> Best regards,
> Ilya

What kind of information?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20160403/eb138390/attachment.html>