Windows vs UTF-8 (issue 15845)

Kagamin via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Apr 4 02:05:36 PDT 2016


On Monday, 4 April 2016 at 00:06:28 UTC, ag0aep6g wrote:
> Weird how bad the support for UTF-8 seems to be in Windows.

UTF-8 is a newer technology. As early adopters of unicode (before 
Unicode 3.0 standard), Windows, OSX and Java used UCS-2 and later 
migrated to UTF-16.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list