uniform initialization in D (as in C++11): i{...}

[Adam D. Ruppe via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 5 April 2016 at 14:45:33 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
> Yeah, that's what I had in mind. new Object{}, int(3) -> 
> int{3}, T() -> T{} (in generic code), and {42, "tuple"} where 
> the type can be deduced.
>
> Unfortunately the (1, 2, 3) syntax is can't be used for tuples 
> because it is ambiguous/looks bad in some



If it is supposed to be uniform, why have the type name in one 
place but not another?

I really don't understand what the problem with Whatever!(x,y,z) 
is.

(other than the fact that Tuple sucks. structs are better in 
every way. but it isn't because of syntax.)