Any usable SIMD implementation?

[Marco Leise via Digitalmars-d]

Am Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:29:11 -0700
schrieb Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com>:

> On 4/4/2016 7:02 AM, 9il wrote:
> >> What kind of information?  
> >
> > Target cpu configuration:
> > - CPU architecture (done)  
> 
> Done.
> 
> > - Count of FP/Integer registers  
> 
> ??
> 
> > - Allowed sets of instructions: for example, AVX2, FMA4  
> 
> Done. D_SIMD

I wonder if answers like this are meant to be filled into a
template like this: "We have [$2] in place for that. If that
doesn't get the job $1, please report whatever is missing to
bugzilla. Thanks!"
Since otherwise it should be clear that the distinction
between AVX2 and FMA4 asks for something more specialized
than D_SIMD, which is basically the same as checking the
front-end __VERSION__.

-- 
Marco