Can std.conv.toImpl please be deprecated

Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Apr 17 15:04:34 PDT 2016


On Sunday, 17 April 2016 at 11:00:33 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> What do you propose that we do instead? We need all of the 
> separate toImpl functions regardless of the name. Do you want 
> to try and embed them all inside of std.conv.to with the name 
> to? I expect that it's feasible, but it would royally suck from 
> the standpoint of unit tests, since then either

If we do as H. S. Teoh is suggesting and go straight to marking 
as private, then there is no reason to.




More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list