final switch and straight integers

[Bastiaan Veelo via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 07:18:55 UTC, Bastiaan Veelo wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20 April 2016 at 06:36:01 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>> Dominikus Dittes Scherkl:
>>
>>> final switch makes no sense on things that are not 
>>> enumerated. Even on ubyte almost nobody will ever list all 
>>> 256 cases, not to mention larger types.
>>
>> It's easy to cover all the values in a switch, using ranges.
>
> 2. No CaseRangeStatements are allowed.

Sorry, pressed Send too early. You mean implement to remove the 
above limitation?