DMD internal: appendToModuleMember performance

[David Nadlinger via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 15 April 2016 at 18:33:44 UTC, Johan Engelen wrote:
> I'm thinking about removing the old array all-together.
> My question is: is it essential to keep an ordered list? (I see 
> a `.shift(...)` call on the array, to put something in first 
> position. If so, could that be solved by having *two* trees, 
> where "in-order" iteration first iterates over the first one 
> and then the second. The "high priority" symbols can then be 
> put in the first tree, normal ones in the second tree (if that 
> is how order matters...).

Did you have a closer look at where this is done? One place where 
order matters is for `object` in `importAll`, but that's 
trivially rewritten a different way.

  — David