Who wore it better?
Nick Treleaven via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Apr 24 03:40:19 PDT 2016
On Friday, 15 April 2016 at 18:46:01 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
> inout(T)[] overlap(T)(inout(T)[] r1, inout(T)[] r2)
Might be nice if inout applied to template parameter types:
T[] overlap(inout T)(T[] r1, T[] r2);
If it wasn't for the virtual function issue, I wonder if inout
would still be needed on runtime arguments given the above
feature?
Using traits like CopyConstness might be enough.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list