String lambdas

Bauss via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Apr 30 09:04:13 PDT 2016


On Saturday, 30 April 2016 at 16:02:02 UTC, Bauss wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 April 2016 at 17:58:22 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> An alternative to string lambads could be something like a 
> shortened version of lambdas like consider
>
> [...]

%1 and %2 should be %0 and %1 and also the < should be > in the 
return statement of course.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list