[DIP] In-place struct initialization

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 at 20:43:25 UTC, Enamex wrote:
> On Wednesday, 3 August 2016 at 20:30:07 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> On Sunday, 31 July 2016 at 14:38:33 UTC, Lodovico Giaretta 
>> wrote:
>>> I support this idea of extending curly-brace initializers. It 
>>> would be very useful and less ambiguous than parenthesized 
>>> initializers.
>>>
>>
>> Curly braces are already extremely overloaded. They can start 
>> a block statement, a delegate literal, a struct literal and 
>> I'm sure I forgot something.
>
> Well, this extended case would fall under "struct literal". And 
> personally I'm against starting function literals with just a 
> brace (always use `(){...}` instead).

It doesn't matter that there is already a struct literal syntax, 
and that it also a struct literal syntax, the parser have to 
support both.
It doesn't matter what you like or don't like, the parser have to 
support it.