Documented unittests & code coverage

Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Aug 5 15:40:40 PDT 2016


On Friday, August 05, 2016 14:10:02 Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 8/5/2016 12:10 PM, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> > [...]
>
> Yes, I pretty much agree with your entire post.

I just wish that you'd agree that issues like these

https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14855
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14856
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14857

should be fixed so that the code coverage metrics would be more accurate. :)
Without those fixes, most of the code that I write will never have 100% code
coverage even if the tests do test everything and test it very throughly.

- Jonathan M Davis



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list