ISO D

[Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, August 17, 2016 08:02:42 eugene via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> Hello, everyone,
> will ISO D be in future or not?

The future? Maybe. But it's unlikely to happen soon. As a whole, the
language is pretty solid, but there are details that still need to be ironed
out spec-wise, there are a few cases where features need to be completed or
expanded, and we're likely to be adding a feature or two to solve some of
the current problems (e.g. Walter is working on adding ref-counting to the
language so that less depends on the GC). So, while D's language definition
is _far_ more stable than it once was, it's still in enough flux that a
standard wouldn't make a lot of sense yet.

- Jonathan M Davis