Dip Discussion

[Illuminati via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 28 August 2016 at 18:43:05 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 August 2016 at 18:17:51 UTC, Illuminati wrote:
>> Maybe for each Dip it would be nice to have a discussion or 
>> comments section exposed in some way. A full fledged 
>> subforum(per DIP) would be better so contrasting threads could 
>> be followed easier.
>
> For now intention is to aggregate all discussion threads / 
> reviews / mail list archives via links in DIP itself. Thanks 
> for reminding about it btw, I have just added 
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1000.md#reviews
>
> Adding something more complicated can be considered but we 
> don't have that much DIP related information traffic yet to 
> make extra complexity worthwhile.

I don't know how you can make such an assertion. It's like saying 
that if there were no humans around to breath there would be no 
oxygen. You have to build something first for it to be used and 
grow, not the other way around, which is illogical. People can't 
use something if it doesn't exist, so you can't claim that for it 
to be created(put in to existence) that first people need to use 
it("have traffic"). The better you build something the more 
people will use it. If you can't build it well then no need to 
beat around the bush.