Low level unit test library in druntime

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d]

On 2016-08-30 18:31, Dicebot wrote:

> I definitely wouldn't want to use API like you proposed if I was to
> write my own test runner. Minimal common ground which would be cool to
> have is getting range/array of all unittest blocks together with their
> annotations. Anything more than that is optional luxury that specific
> test systems may define.

Basically the only thing that would be different in different frameworks :(

> And any usage of classes in what is supposed to be a base ground API is
> immediate "no" for me :)

Yeah that would be crazy, like threads, fibers, sockets and exceptions ;)

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg