Contribution to cover C++11 functionality
Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Dec 1 09:20:06 PST 2016
On Thursday, 1 December 2016 at 15:28:28 UTC, Jethro wrote:
> There is a problem with `distribution` in that it also has
> other meanings.
Yes, but in context, is `random distribution` actually ambiguous?
What might people confuse it with?
> `Random variable` is pretty well established
But is that matching with the strictest of mathematical
terminology worth it compared to matching terminology with a well
established API standard?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list