Contribution to cover C++11 functionality

Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Dec 1 09:20:06 PST 2016


On Thursday, 1 December 2016 at 15:28:28 UTC, Jethro wrote:
> There is a problem with `distribution` in that it also has 
> other meanings.

Yes, but in context, is `random distribution` actually ambiguous? 
  What might people confuse it with?

> `Random variable` is pretty well established

But is that matching with the strictest of mathematical 
terminology worth it compared to matching terminology with a well 
established API standard?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list