Should we warn if we detect null derefernces or void value uses ?
Daniel Kozak via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 4 23:25:20 PST 2016
Dne 5.12.2016 v 06:03 Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d napsal(a):
> On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 04:59:01 UTC, ketmar wrote:
>> On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 04:41:55 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>> What is your opinion, should we warn if we unambiguously detect
>>> something that is clearly unwanted ?
>>>
>>> int fn(int y)
>>> {
>>> int x = void;
>>> ++x;
>>> return x+y;
>>> }
>>>
>>> This requires data-flow analysis (The same kind that tells you if
>>> you are skipping a statement)
>>> And will slow down compilation a little if we enable such a warning.
>>
>> no need to. if i explicitly wrote `=void` there, i know what i am
>> doing. maybe i want that UB. or something. and i tried to tell the
>> compiler STFU. please, don't make it harder, and don't force me to
>> invent another ways to say STFU.
>
> Even if you want that ub.
> A warning will not halt the compilation.
Yes, but still will be there. I always try to have no warnings, maybe as
a special compilation flag could enable this.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list