CTFE Status
Stefan Koch via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Dec 6 08:27:38 PST 2016
On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 18:47:13 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Monday, 5 December 2016 at 16:47:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>> On 12/05/2016 11:28 AM, Stefan Koch wrote:
>>> It looks like the performance wins brought by the new ctfe
>>> engine might
>>> be higher then I predicted.
>>
>> That's awesome!! -- Andrei
>
> After discovering this performance bottleneck I have now
> changed my mind about how I will tackle concatenation of arrays
> and strings in particular.
> All con-cat operations should be done as intrinsic calls.
> Because tight cooperation with the
> CTFE-Memory-Management-Subsystem is needed.
I just implemented a bytecode cache, however the bytecode
generation is so fast now that we only safe a couple micro
seconds by using the cache.
It is not noticeable at all :P.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list