CTFE Status

[Anonymouse via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 11 December 2016 at 08:37:28 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> Disregard That!
> I wasn't paying attention
> The lower numbers are produced by ldc!
> The performance fixes did lower the overall overhead even more 
> though.
> Which means bytecode generation will not even show up among the 
> top 50 functions in dmd,

Would you say it has ended up being more or less (or roughly 
equal) work than you initially expected?

And keep up the good work!