A betterC modular standard library?

[Radu via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 18 December 2016 at 15:01:55 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
wrote:
> On Sunday, 18 December 2016 at 14:37:55 UTC, Radu wrote:
>> [...]
>
> Maybe I will be able to propose them on DConf.
>
>> [...]
>
> Yes/No in the same time.
>
> 1. It would be always possible to use Mir and Phobos together, 
> 100% guarantee. Furthermore, some Mir libraries are going to be 
> infrastructure for _all_, not only for D. For example Mir GLAS 
> will target the Julia language after D.
>
> 2. In the same time many thing is not possible to create with 
> Phobos/Druntime. The simplest example is numeric libraries. I 
> can create a multithread GLAS with core.thread, but if I do so 
> GLAS will never be accepted as default BLAS implementation for 
> Julia. So, i need to create my own low level thread library. 
> Intel MKL, OpenBLAS have their own thread management: this is 
> common practice.
>
> Cheers,
> Ilya

I get point 2, but I should be able to use your new modules 
without giving up druntime/phobos, right?. They should not be 
mutual exclusive!