A betterC modular standard library?

[Guillaume Piolat via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 19:52:43 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
wrote:
> How this can work for libraries? Please read this thread.
> This is not realistic. This a huge constraint for D libraries 
> to be modular, replaceable and distributed in binary form.

They can be at the MIR level.

How this can work: Mir libraries are distributed as static and 
dynamic libs, whatever.
Each one of these links statically with the same druntime and 
libphobos. When the user replace one MIR library it also replaces 
the others.

I don't see what isn't realistic here.

See also: CUDA, Intel Performance Primitives...
People update CUDA in bunch, they don't use cuDNN from release 
6.15 with cuRuntime from release 7.8