A betterC modular standard library?
Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Dec 19 12:29:48 PST 2016
On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 20:22:29 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> On 19 December 2016 at 20:42, Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d
> <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>> On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 19:31:24 UTC, Guillaume Piolat
>>> On Sunday, 18 December 2016 at 09:26:09 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko
>>> If I understand correctly, the only reaon not to disable the
>>> runtime instead of going betterC (what I call runtime-free vs
>>> runtime-less) is because Phobos and druntime aren't ported to
>>> every platform you need, but the libC is.
>> 1. DRuntime has not fixed API
>> 2. It has not backward binary compatibility
>> 3. It has not cross-compiler binary compatibility.
>> So, it can not be used.
> You're confusing druntime with phobos. I haven't changed any
> bindings to druntime in years...
If someone build a library with GCC and another one with Clang
they will work together. What about LDC and GDC?
More information about the Digitalmars-d