A betterC modular standard library?

[Ilya Yaroshenko via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 20:24:21 UTC, Guillaume Piolat 
wrote:
> On Monday, 19 December 2016 at 20:05:20 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko 
> wrote:
>> [...]
>
> If Mir libs are static libs this can indeed be a problem.
> If someone has made another D library like this, it will either 
> have to be its own dynlib or come with a runtime with the same 
> API. You can manage to use very little of druntime such as 
> "emplace"/"destroy" and that's about it when it comes to API.
>
> [...]

No, Mir is not a hardware manufacturer which forces its users to 
do something.

> Note that with MIR being several dynlibs everyone of Mir 
> library can come with any runtime (and then use it or not) 
> without interaction of these runtimes.
>
> [...]

Looks like bad design. Existing C libs would be better then.