DIP10005: Dependency-Carrying Declarations is now available for community feedback

Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Dec 19 18:55:32 PST 2016


On 12/14/2016 06:11 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On thinking about this again, though, isn't the whole point of this DIP
> to add a way of attaching imports X, Y, Z to some declaration such that
> the imports are in effect for the scope of the declaration?  The
> specific syntax is really secondary.  I think we should rather be more
> concerned about the semantics of it, such as:
[snip]

Thanks very much for your review. I just pushed a commit addressing it. 
-- Andrei


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list